SACOG Board 2025-03-20 (in Rocklin)

The SACOG monthly board meeting will be held in Rocklin this month, Thursday, March 20, at 9:45 AM, at Rocklin Event Center, 2650 Sunset Blvd, Rocklin, CA. It can be viewed on YouTube via the Meetings and Agendas page. Comments may be made in person (in Rocklin), or via email ahead of time to lespinoza@sacog.org. Most board meetings are held at the SACOG Board Room on L Street in Sacramento, but some meetings rotate through the cities and counties in the SACOG region.


Agenda (the official agenda has more detail for each agenda item than below, and the html agenda on the Meetings & Agendas page has staff reports and presentation links; the links below are just a few items of particular interest to me):

Consent:

  1. Approve Minutes of the February 20, 2025, Board Meeting
  2. Approve Revised Local Transportation Fund Allocations for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 for Sacramento County
  3. Approve Local Transportation Fund Findings of Apportionment for Fiscal Year 2025-2026
  4. Approve State of Good Repair Fund Allocation for Fiscal Year 2025-2026
  5. Approve State Transit Assistance Fund Allocation for Fiscal Year 2025-2026; staff report; allocation
  6. Approve Low Carbon Transit Operations Funds Allocations for Fiscal Year 2024- 2025; staff report; allocation
  7. Approve Capital Area Regional Tolling Authority Appointment
  8. Approve Contract Authorization for SB 125 Long-Term Financial Plan and Recovery Strategy and Annual Financial Analysis; staff report
  9. Approve Engage, Empower, Implement Award Correction

Action:

  1. Approve 2025 Regional Active Transportation Program Funding Recommendation (Summer Lopez), recommendations, presentation
  2. Public Hearing: Staff Vacancies (Erik Johnson)
  3. Approve Draft Budget and Overall Work Program for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, Adopt Salary Schedules and Hold Hearing on Vacancies (Loretta Su)

Information:

  1. Capital Area Regional Tolling Authority Loan and Staffing Services (Erik Johnson)

Workshop:

  1. Lessons Learned from Rocklin’s Growth (Lanette Espinoza); staff report; no presentation available yet

Reports:

  1. Chair’s Report, Board Members’ Reports and Executive Director’s Report (Lanette Espinoza)

Receive & File:

  1. Regional Transportation Demand Management Platform “NorCal GO” Launch (Nicole Porter)
  2. 2026 Regional Trail Implementation Strategy Update (Summer Lopez)
  3. U.S. 50 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan Overview (Dustin Foster)
  4. From Plan to Action: Implementing the 2025 Blueprint (Clint Holtzen)
  5. Advocacy Update (Renee DeVere-Oki)
  6. Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Quarterly Financial Report (Loretta Su)
  7. Green Means Go: Local Efforts to Accelerate Housing (Gregory Chew)
  8. Regional 511 Traveler Information Systems Contract and Service Continuity Considerations (Chase McFadden)

Adjournment:


SacATC 2025-03-20

The Sacramento Active Transportation Commission will meet this Thursday, March 20, 2025, at 5:30 PM. Comments may be made in person during the meeting, or beforehand via the eComment capability on the Upcoming Meetings page. Though the meeting is live-streamed on that same page, comments may not be made in that way.


The core agenda is:

Consent Calendar

  1. Approval of Active Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
  2. Active Transportation Commission Log

Discussion Calendar

  1. Airport South Industrial Annexation – Amendments to the City Bicycle Master Plan
  2. Streets for People Draft Plan and Phase III Community Engagement Approach (staff report, Streets for People Draft Plan; note: the plan is a large document, and does not include appendices, which can be downloaded from the Streets for People webpage)

In the webinar today, a comment was made that the information in the plan and in the webinar is very complex and hard to get a handle on. I agree. Even as a transportation nerd, it is very hard to digest. I’d suggest the city come up with a simple presention, even simpler than the Executive Summary, that speaks to people who just want better and safer transportation for walking and bicycling, but know little about transportation planning and infrastructure. Some people will want to focus on the streets in their neighborhood where they live, or the routes they travel. Others will want to focus on the policy and approach of the plan. It is probably not possible to look at and understand both.

As I’ve said, I hope to post more detailed information and comments on the plan, but haven’t gotten to that yet.

Caltrans D3 says ‘fuck you’ to Yolo bicyclists

The bike path along I-80 along the Yolo causeway is closed this afternoon (Tuesday, 2:00 PM). The sign at the east entry to the bike paths says:

Bike Path Closed sign on east entry to Yolo causeway bike path
Bike Path Closed sign on east entry to Yolo causeway bike path

Note that this sign indicates that the path will not be closed until 8 PM on Tuesday, March 18.

This is what the Caltrans website says (UPDATE: Extended 79-hour Closure for Eastbound U.S. Highway 50 in Yolo County Postponed due to Weather Forecast, 2025-03-13, retrieved 2025-03-18 3:00 PM):

screen capture from Caltrans D3 website
screen capture from Caltrans D3 website

Note that this press release says that the path will be open again by 6:00 AM on Tuesday, March 18.

And this is the reality is:

construction on Yolo causeway bike path
construction on Yolo causeway bike path

Construction is completely blocking the path, at this location and several others. The work to remove the concrete barrier from the freeway is ongoing along the western section of the causeway. Some parts of the freeway are also torn up, awaiting reconstruction.

I talked to the supervisor at this construction location, and he said they are just a subcontractor, not responsible for Caltrans signing, or lack thereof. He called the general contractor, who apparently said it is my problem, not theirs. After exiting at the I-80 off-ramp (the normal entry to the path north to Yolo County 32A is not accessible), I saw a CHP officer, and reported the issue to him. He said he would pass it along. He probably will, but I doubt that either CHP nor Caltrans will do anything about it.

This is an active construction project which was not properly signed for construction. This is a violation of Caltrans procedure, and state law, and federal law.

It is absolutely typical of Caltrans District 3 (which includes Yolo and Sacramento counties) to not care about the travel or safety of bicyclists. What would it take to correct the signing, and to correct the website? Not much, but it is beyond the care and interest of Caltrans D3.

Caltrans has said that as a result of the Yolo 80 project, there would be an improved bike path. I’ve previously written about why that is very likely to be a lie: Yolo causeway bike path. Note that though Caltrans claims the current construction is just bridge rehabilitation and has nothing to do with the Yolo 80 project, that is a lie. It is safe to assume that everything Caltrans D3 says is a lie. Caltrans is a highway department, not a transportation department. They care about motor vehicles. They do not care about walkers or bicyclists or air quality or the state budget. In fact, given the high fatality rate on both under-construction and completed highway projects, they don’t really care about motor vehicle drivers either.

I will also note that the California Transportation Commission (CTC) is complicit in Caltrans D3 malfeasance, as they continue to fund projects no matter what the behavior or violation of the law. And above CTC, California State Transportation Agency, which is intended to oversee both CTC and Caltrans, but does not.

this week 2025-03-17

SacMoves Coalition hosts an event calendar at https://sacmoves.org/events/, which is maintained by STAR (Sacramento Transit Advocates and Riders) and Getting Around Sacramento. ‘This week’ postings are irregular.

Monday 17

  • House Sacramento (SacYIMBY), 6:00 PM, New Helvetia Brewing (the meeting was moved to Urban Roots; future meeting dates and locations yet to be determined)

Tuesday 18

  • SacCity Streets for People Citywide Virtual Workshop #1; 12:00 PM; register
  • Sacramento City Council; 5:00 PM; agenda

Wednesday 19

  • SACOG Transit Coordinating Committee, 9:00 AM, via Zoom; agenda; post
  • SacCity Streets for People Citywide Virtual Workshop #2; 5:00 PM; register

Thursday 20

  • SACOG Board, 9:45 AM; Rocklin (not Sac) or online; agenda
  • SacRT MAC (Mobility Advisory Council), 2:30 PM; agenda; post
  • SacATC (Sacramento Active Transportation Commission), 5:30 PM; agenda; post

Friday 21

Saturday 22

Sunday 23

I missed two important meetings the previous week, because they were not on their usual schedule: CARTA on Monday, 10th, and SacTA, Thursday, 13th.

HSIP grants for SACOG region

Caltrans has released a list of $300M in projects under the HSIP (Highway Safety Improvement Program) program of federal funds. See Streetsblog: State Announces Nearly $300 Million in Grants for Safe Streets for more information. The funds are a mix of federal and state, but the awards are selected by the state. Unlike most projects funded by the federal and state, these projects really do have a focus on safety, though the various signals in these grants may be as much motor vehicle focused as walker and bicyclist focused. The City of Sacramento has installed beg buttons, replacing auto-recall pedestrian signals, in an effort to ease traffic flow and only secondarily make it safer for people walking, so there is a concern about how signals will be implemented.

Twenty-three of the projects are in the SACOG region. A pdf of those is available. Presumably descriptions of each project are available somewhere, but I’ve been unable to locate them. If I do find them, I’ll highlight a few of particular interest.

SacCity Streets for People draft plan

for Matt

Additional posts on the Streets for People Plan will be under category: Streets for People – Active Transportation Network. I encourage you to take a look at Strong SacTown’s series of posts on Street Design Standards. And all of the NACTO Design Guides. And Jeff Speck’s Walkable City and Walkable City Rules. But your own lived experience is just as valuable as the words of the experts, so please join in to support and improve the plan.

The City of Sacramento Streets for People draft plan has been released. The Streets for People / Active Transportation Plan webpage has more detail. The body of the plan is a little difficult to download there, so it is also available here (57MB pdf). The appendices and related documents are easy to download there (I don’t know why Appendix 5 is missing). A comment about terminology: ‘Streets for People’ refers both to the overall Active Transportation Plan, and to this specific section of the overall plan. The Streets for People: Sacramento’s Active Transportation Plan public draft 2025-03 is the section that covers arterial and major collector streets. Local streets are covered in the Neighborhood Connections Plan (2025-01), which has now be adopted by the city and will be incorporated into the overall plan later this year. The diagram below shows the relationship, with the green neighborhood connections, and the blue ‘active transportation network’ which is the topic of the draft plan.

I have only skimmed the plan, so don’t have comments yet, but since it is out there, I hope that many people will take a look and comment. To the city, mainly, but you can also comment on this blog post. Comments are accepted through April 6. Though the map for gathering geographically related comments is closed, it is still available for viewing. You can submit comments through a form, probably best for general comments that apply to the process or the overall document. You can email city staff directly at StreetsForPeople@cityofsacramento.org. The preferred method for comments is to make comments directly on the pdf, available at https://streetsforpeopledraftplan.altago.cloud/#/, probably best for specific comments on text or graphics. You can also sign up to receive email updates.

The Neighborhood Connections Plan is great and provides a solid basis for improving both safety comfort level for people walking and bicycling in their neighborhood. However, local streets are not where the majority of crashes occur, certainly not the fatality and severe injury crashes. These occur on arterial and major collector streets, the ones that were designed for motor vehicle movement and convenience. These roadways are too wide, and too fast. Yet many walking and particularly bicycling trips must cross or travel along these dangerous streets. Until these streets are redesigned to not only accommodate but encourage walking and bicycling, most people won’t leave their immediate neighborhood, and will continue to make most trips, even short trips, but motor vehicle. And that is the subject of this draft plan, and why it is so important.


Table of Contents

  • 1 About This Plan
    • What Is Streets for People?
    • Need for a Focused Approach
    • What’s in the Plan?
    • Plan Goals
    • Recent Achievements
  • 2 Walking, Biking, and Rolling in Sacramento Today
    • Building on the Past
    • What the Data Shows
    • Equity
    • Walking and Rolling
    • Biking
    • Safety
    • Comfort
    • Access
    • Sustainability
  • 3 Community Engagement
    • Leading with Equity
    • Community Planning Team
    • Engagement Events
    • What We Heard
  • 4 Recommendations 52
    • Network Recommendations
    • Intersection Recommendations
    • Recommended Policies and Programs
    • Maintenance Considerations
  • 5 Implementation
    • Costs
    • Funding
    • Monitoring and Review
    • Next Steps
  • A Appendices (which are in separate documents, available on the webpage)

West Sacramento Vision Zero Action Plan

The City of West Sacramento is developing a Vision Zero Action Plan. If you live in, work in, or travel in West Sacramento, I encourage you to take a look at the VZ page. The map showing crash locations, nearly all at intersections, indicate that West Capitol Ave is the epicenter for traffic violence, with Sacramento Ave coming in second. That is my own experience in riding and walking on these arterial streets. West Capitol Ave is the route for Yolobus 42A/42B, and several other routes.

Vision Zero high-injury map for West Sacramento

State Rail Plan webinar March 4

Seamless Bay Area and Californians for Electric Rail are hosting a webinar, New State Rail Plan Explained: A vision for an integrated, cohesive California rail network on March 4, 2025, at 12:00 PM. Registration is required, but free.

The Caltrans/California State Transportation Agency 2024 California State Rail Plan (2024-12) is available for review. An earlier draft emphasized hydrogen trains to the exclusion of overhead catenary wire electric trains, but the current version includes catenary, battery electric and hydrogen fuel cell electric.

From the registration page: “The newly released State Rail Plan lays out strategies that can significantly impact how Californians and visitors get around the state – and can make California a place that’s easier for everyone to get around in an affordable, low-carbon, safe, and accessible way. The plan establishes a long-term vision for an integrated, cohesive statewide rail system that offers passenger and freight service and helps achieve California’s mobility, economic, and climate goals. Tune into this webinar to learn about the plan from California State Transportation Agency staff. Researchers and advocates will give their reaction to the updated plan including cost analysis, the political changes needed to implement reforms, and upcoming funding and reform opportunities.”

Whether or not you can attend this webinar, I encourage you to read the 2024 California State Rail Plan, focusing on the routes or concepts that are most important to you.

The Capitol Corridor, Sacramento/Roseville to San Jose, is called out for electrification, but the source power is not defined. Capitol Corridor is not specifically a single project, but part of several projects including Transbay Crossing, Leveraging Mega-Investments, Sea Level Rise, and Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys. In stages, Capitol Corridor service is planned to reach once per hour in the mid-term, and once per 30 minutes in the long term. Current service is one hour at peak times of day, but two to three hours at other times.

Many transportation advocates strongly support catenary electrification of the Capitol Corridor route between Sacramento and San Jose. I have also advanced the idea of state purchase of the rails in heavy passenger rail corridors, which would include Capitol Corridor, either through willing seller or condemnation if necessary. Freight rolling stock would still be owned and operated by the railroads, but passenger trains would now have priority over freight trains, and the freight railroads could not resist catenary electrification.

I hope to provide more detailed analysis of the state plan in the near future.

timeline for Tier 4 diesel and zero emissions
2050 electrified corridors
long-term service plan

SACOG Regional Planning Partnership

The SACOG Regional Planning Partnership (RPP) is holding its quarterly meeting tomorrow, February 26, 2025, at 2:00 PM, online via Zoom. Registration is required. The RPP is not part of the SACOG governance structure, but is an advisory group, or forum for transportation and air quality concerns to increase coordination within the region. The agenda is not a traditional one for SACOG with staff reports and presentations, but there are a number of links in the agenda of interest.

Discussion of these items will likely be at an overview level, not the detailed discussion that happens in SACOG committees.

quick build at SacCity Budget & Audit

Note: Added letters of support from four organizations, below.

The Budget & Audit Committee of the Sacramento City Council meets tomorrow (!) Tuesday, February 25, 2025, 11:00 AM in city hall council chambers. The Budget & Audit Committee members are Roger Dickinson, Chair, District 2; Karina Talamantes, District 3; Caity Maple, District 5; and Eric Guerra, District 6.

On the agenda is item 10 SacATC 2024 Annual Report. The discussion, however, will include more than just the annual report. It will include the city’s proposed quick build program. Quick build, sometimes called tactical urbanism, is a concept related to Vision Zero, that rather than just accepting traffic violence, the city would take action to reduce or prevent future crashes at that location. What makes it unique, and different from the long term roadway redesign that the city undertakes when they can get grant funding, quick build analyzes the issue now, and takes action soon to correct it.

The city is calling this effort TAG Team (tactical action group), and it would be implemented from existing budget and staffing limits with six staff dedicated to the project.

If you can’t make daytime meetings, you can submit an eComment on the city meetings page. The earlier you submit eComments, the more likely committee members are to see them before the meeting.

Three examples of quick builds: the street closure and bikeway improvement at Broadway and 2nd Avenue and 34th Street, with yellow vertical delineators; the corner curb extensions that have been installed at some corners with paint and/or white vertical delineators, and lane channelization delineators on 15th and 16th Streets. Vertical delineators are much less expensive, and also somewhat less effective, than concrete curbs, but they do reduce the likelihood and/or severity of crashes.

Letters of support:


The same day, at the evening Sacramento City Council meeting, the Neighborhood Connections plan, part of the Streets for All Active Transportation Plan, is on the on the consent agenda, item 9 Neighborhood Connections Plan. The plan is full of specific designs that can be implemented in temporary and/or less expensive materials. See earlier posts under categories Active Transportation Plan, Neighborhood Connections, Street Design Standards, and particularly traffic calming measures. The Neighborhood Connections Draft Final Plan (2025-01) is also available, if you have time to read it. Though it is on the consent calendar and unlikely to be controversial, it still deserves support.