SacATC 2025-04-17

Dan AllisonLeave a comment

The Sacramento Active Transportation Commission (SacATC) will meet Thursday, Aprll 17, 2025, at 5:30 PM. The meetings are held in city council chambers at 915 I St, Sacramento, CA 95814. The meeting can be viewed online via the link provided on the city Upcoming Meeting Materials page at the time of the meeting, but comments may only be made in person, or via eComment ahead of time.

The agenda is

Consent Calendar:

  1. Approval of Active Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
  2. Active Transportation Commission Log

Discussion Calendar:

  1. Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements – 2025; presentation
  2. Audible Signals Phase 2; presentation

I have concerns about the use of RRFBs (Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons) at unsignalized crosswalks. They may be better than crosswalks without, however, they may provide a false sende of security for walkers. I have noticed (anecdotal evidence only) that the rate of driver compliance with RRFBs is poor, only about 40%, which is not much better than unprotected crosswalks, and it has not improved at drivers have gotten used to the RRFB as they are installed in more locations. I would suggest that before the city install any additional RRFBs, there a literature survey to see if there are recent indications of driver non-compliance increasing hazard for people walking, and on-the-ground observation of at least two existing locations in the city. I know that compliance with the RRFB on J Street at 17th Street is poor. I have almost been hit in both the west and east crosswalks, both of which have RRFBs. I kinow not to trust drivers to yield, but what about people walking who do not know to not trust drivers. The other enhancements proposed seem good.

In Audible Signals Phase 1, a number of locations in the central city where pedestrian signals were on auto-recall were converted, or downgraded, to locations requiring the push of a button. These are called beg-buttons) because the pedestrian indicator will never come on unless the button is pushed, though with many of the locations, the pedestrian signal is set to auto-recall even though the button says it must be pressed. This is an unofficial city policy, that people walking will NOT be informed of the operation of the pedestrian signal, left to guess whether it is auto-recall or requiring a push. The recently installed ‘push or wave to cross’ signals do not overcome this issue. The staff report claims that all of the new locations already have push buttons, though it does not say whether any are on auto-recall.

The city is claiming as support for the past and proposed audible signals project that citizens are requesting beg buttons. They are not. What they are requesting is audible signals that communicate effective crossing information to visually impaired walkers (or rollers), to comply with current ProWAG requirements. The city is conflating audible signals with push buttons, but they do not need to go together. Audible signals can be installed at auto-recall intersections.

See earlier posts Central City Mobility: new beg buttons on 5th Street, update on SacCity new beg buttons on Alhambra, Sac City NEW beg buttons, beg button signs, and Beg buttons on K? Really?.

SACOG Board 2025-04-17

Dan AllisonLeave a comment

The SACOG Board of Directors will meet next week, Thursday, April 17, 2025, starting at 9:30 AM. The meeting will be held in the board room at 1415 L St, Ste 300, Sacramento, CA 95814. It can be viewed online via the link available on the Meetings and Agendas page at the time of the meeting. Comments may be made in person, or 24 hours ahead of time to board clerk Lanette Espinoza, lespinoza@sacog.org. No comments may be made online.

The agenda is:

Consent:

  1. Approve Minutes of the March 20, 2025, Board Meeting
  2. Approve the Transportation Development Act claims for the City of Folsom and Yuba-Sutter Transit Authority
  3. Approve Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Transit Operators Projects for Low Carbon Transit Operations Funds
  4. Green Means Go Planning Category Contract Re-Assignment: Bowman Sewer Study
  5. Approve Amendment #2 to the Budget and Overall Work Program for Fiscal Year 2024-2025
  6. Approve State of Good Repair Project Changes for Yolo County Transportation District (Est. Time: 0 minutes)
  7. Authorize Capital Area Regional Tolling Authority Loan and Staffing Services Agreement
  8. Approve Resolution Thanking and Honoring Gregory Chew Upon His Retirement

Action:

  1. Transit Representation on Metropolitan Planning Organizations & Governance Update/MOU
  2. Senate Bill 125 Transit Program Funding Plan and Updated SACOG Guidelines
  3. Adopt the Final Budget and Overall Work Program for Fiscal Year 2025-2026

Information:

  1. Race, Equity, and Inclusion Working Group Report Out
  2. Mobility Zones – Phase 1 Zones

Workshop:

  1. Effective and Efficient Public Transit: Lessons Learned from Peer Regions across the U.S.

The Meetings and Agenda page has links to the html and pdf agenda, and the html and pdf packet. Presentations are usually posted closer to the meeting.

AB 1223 for wider SacTA authority

Dan Allison1 Comment

AB 1223: Local Transportation Authority and Improvement Act: Sacramento Transportation Authority (Nguyen/Krell) has been introduced in this legislative session. As of April 2, it is still in the Assembly Local Government Committee.

“The bill would provide that the allowable expenditure categories for revenues from a tax imposed by STA include the construction, modernization, and improvement of infrastructure, as defined, that supports infill or transit-oriented development and would reduce vehicle miles traveled.” It would also allow Sacramento Transportation Authority (SacTA) to develop and operate toll facilities, and to impose taxes on areas of less than the entire county.

SacTA is currently operating under general state legislation, and the Measure A code that established the authority. The authority now wishes to make clear that expenditures which broaden the mission to more transportation and infrastructure projects that support transportation are within the purview of the authority.

It isn’t clear to me how the toll facilities ability would mesh with the Capitol Area Regional Tolling Authority (CARTA) which is intended to cover the SACOG region.

The less than-full-county voting area is similar to that implemented for SacRT, but does not require that two or more cities be adjacent, as does the SacRT legislation. The idea is the same, that some areas of the county will be opposed to any sales tax measure, no matter what it contains, so creating a measure that targets supporting areas makes sense.

SACOG Transportation Committee 2025-04-03

Dan AllisonLeave a comment

The SACOG Transportation Committee will meet on Thursday, April 3, 2025, at 10:00 AM, in person at 1415 L Street, Suite 300, Sacramento, CA 95814. The meetings often last about two hours.

The agenda is available on the SACOG Meetings & Agendas page, but I have also provided the overall agenda and the specific agenda items below. The single, large agenda packet contains 10 agenda items, only some of which would be of interest to most readers. I have rotated all the presentations so they are readable in vertical. Usually presentations are attached as separate items, so I’m not sure whether these will be presented during the meeting or are there for information.

The meetings are also streamed, from the Meetings & Agendas page, at the time of the meeting, and can be viewed later on the SACOG YouTube channel.

Comments may be made in person, or by email ahead of time to the Board Clerk, lespinoza@sacog.org. No comments are taken via streaming or by phone.

Though nearly all items that come before the Transportation Committee also go to the Board of Directors, at the next or soon-after meeting, items are often discussed in more detail at the Transportation Committee than the Board, so if an item is of particular interest to you, you may want to follow it now. Proposals are sometimes modified at the Transportation Committee meeting, or as a result of Transportation Committee discussion, before they go to the Board.

I have skimmed the agenda items, and don’t have any strong comments now, but may if I have a chance to look at them more closely.

Agenda

  1. Approve Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Transit Operators Projects for Low Carbon Transit Operations Funds
  2. Senate Bill 125 Transit Program Funding Plan and Updated SACOG Guidelines
  3. Transit Representation on Metropolitan Planning Organizations & Governance Update/MOU
  4. From Plan to Action: Implementing the 2025 Blueprint
  5. Mobility Zones – Phase 1 Zones
  6. U.S. 50 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan Policy Framework Input
  7. Transportation Options for Upcoming A’s Games
  8. May is Bike Month 2025 Update
  9. Capital Area Regional Tolling Authority Board January-March Recap

SacCity crash dashboard

Dan Allison1 Comment

Corrections: Crash data is from Sacramento Police Department, not SWTRS, but does use the SWITRS selection categories. Demographic data is from the Transportation Priorities Plan.

The City of Sacramento has released a VZ Crash Dashboard with an interactive map and charts. The dashboard apparently uses data from SWITRS for crash data (which means that it will never be up-to-date, as SWITRS is never up-to-date, but patterns don’t depend on up-to-date data), but is selected for the City of Sacramento, and also has demographic data layers for ‘SB 535 disadvantaged communities’, ‘neighborhoods that lack transportation infrastructure’, and ‘communities that have been recipients of racism and bias’. You can turn on and off layers, and can select for crashes on a wide variety of criteria, such as ‘severity’ (fatality, severe injury, etc.) and ‘involved with’ (bicycle, pedestrians, etc.), which are criteria from the SWITRS database.

I have only explored the data in a superficial manner, but noticed some interesting geographic patterns. If you look at crash density, the central city looks bad, but for fatalities only, it looks better than many parts of the city. There are several arterial roadways that were identified as high injury network (HIN) corridors but were not in the Vision Zero Action Plan. However, a visual representation does not necessarily reflect the details of data.

What patterns do you see in the crash dashboard?

VZ crash dashboard map, selected for severity = fatal
VZ crash dashboard map, selected for severity = fatal

quick build at SacCouncil 2025-03-25

Dan Allison4 Comments

The Sacramento City Council meeting on Tuesday, March 25, 2025 (agenda), starting at 5:00 PM (not the 2:00 meeting) will consider a proposed quick build program. Agenda item 21 is ‘Transportation Safety Initiative: Establish Positions, Establish Quick Build Capital Improvement Project, and Suspend Competitive Bidding and Approve an Alternative Procurement Process to Install Signing and Striping and Quick Build Improvements (Two-Thirds Vote Required)‘.

This quick build proposal is worth supporting, whether in person at the council meeting, or ahead of time using the eComment capability on the Upcoming Meeting Materials page. Transportation advocates have been asking for a quick build program (also called tactical urbanism, though they are subtly different) for years. When Councilmember Caity Maple and others proposed an emergency declaration over traffic violence, advocates pushed for quick build to be the top element of that proposal. The city has done a few such projects, such as the closure of a block of 2nd Avenue at Broadway and 34th Street to increase safety for bicyclists and simplify complex intersections. Photo below. But this new program would greatly accelerate the implementation of quick build projects. Some will be at the location of major crashes, while others will be at locations where crashes might be expected and where prior city neglect of lower income neighborhoods has resulted in more unsafe walking and bicycling.

photo of 2nd Ave and Broadway delineators
Sac_2nd-Ave-Broadway_delineators

The program would have a Traffic Safety Team staff of six FTE (full time equivalent), paid with funds from existing budget categories in Public Works. The program would suspend competitive bidding requirements so that projects could be implemented quickly.

The Vision Zero or Safe Systems approach to roadway safety is to immediately change the street design with temporary fixes that slow or channelize traffic, and then to eventually replace these with permanent design changes. The Street Design Standards update (category: Street Design Standards) and Strong SacTown (tag: Street Design Standards), the Active Transportation Plan, Neighborhood Connections and Streets for People Active Transportation Network, and many other efforts align with the quick build program. Most of the traffic calming measures in Neighborhood Connections (SacCity Neighborhood Connections) and and many of the traffic calming measures in Streets for People Active Transportation Network visual gallery – pedestrian and visual gallery – bikeway can also be implemented in quick build, as the photo below shows, a temporary curb extension with vertical delineators.

photo of Land Park Dr & 8th Ave curb extension
Land Park Dr & 8th Ave curb extension

The SacATC 2024 Annual Report is also on the agenda, item 1 on the consent agenda. It is not expected to be controversial, but it would be nice if a couple of people spoke in support, just to remind council that advocates are interested and supportive.

SACOG Board 2025-03-20 (in Rocklin)

Dan AllisonLeave a comment

The SACOG monthly board meeting will be held in Rocklin this month, Thursday, March 20, at 9:45 AM, at Rocklin Event Center, 2650 Sunset Blvd, Rocklin, CA. It can be viewed on YouTube via the Meetings and Agendas page. Comments may be made in person (in Rocklin), or via email ahead of time to lespinoza@sacog.org. Most board meetings are held at the SACOG Board Room on L Street in Sacramento, but some meetings rotate through the cities and counties in the SACOG region.

Agenda (the official agenda has more detail for each agenda item than below, and the html agenda on the Meetings & Agendas page has staff reports and presentation links; the links below are just a few items of particular interest to me):

Consent:

  1. Approve Minutes of the February 20, 2025, Board Meeting
  2. Approve Revised Local Transportation Fund Allocations for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 for Sacramento County
  3. Approve Local Transportation Fund Findings of Apportionment for Fiscal Year 2025-2026
  4. Approve State of Good Repair Fund Allocation for Fiscal Year 2025-2026
  5. Approve State Transit Assistance Fund Allocation for Fiscal Year 2025-2026; staff report; allocation
  6. Approve Low Carbon Transit Operations Funds Allocations for Fiscal Year 2024- 2025; staff report; allocation
  7. Approve Capital Area Regional Tolling Authority Appointment
  8. Approve Contract Authorization for SB 125 Long-Term Financial Plan and Recovery Strategy and Annual Financial Analysis; staff report
  9. Approve Engage, Empower, Implement Award Correction

Action:

  1. Approve 2025 Regional Active Transportation Program Funding Recommendation (Summer Lopez), recommendations, presentation
  2. Public Hearing: Staff Vacancies (Erik Johnson)
  3. Approve Draft Budget and Overall Work Program for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, Adopt Salary Schedules and Hold Hearing on Vacancies (Loretta Su)

Information:

  1. Capital Area Regional Tolling Authority Loan and Staffing Services (Erik Johnson)

Workshop:

  1. Lessons Learned from Rocklin’s Growth (Lanette Espinoza); staff report; no presentation available yet

Reports:

  1. Chair’s Report, Board Members’ Reports and Executive Director’s Report (Lanette Espinoza)

Receive & File:

  1. Regional Transportation Demand Management Platform “NorCal GO” Launch (Nicole Porter)
  2. 2026 Regional Trail Implementation Strategy Update (Summer Lopez)
  3. U.S. 50 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan Overview (Dustin Foster)
  4. From Plan to Action: Implementing the 2025 Blueprint (Clint Holtzen)
  5. Advocacy Update (Renee DeVere-Oki)
  6. Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Quarterly Financial Report (Loretta Su)
  7. Green Means Go: Local Efforts to Accelerate Housing (Gregory Chew)
  8. Regional 511 Traveler Information Systems Contract and Service Continuity Considerations (Chase McFadden)

Adjournment:

SacATC 2025-03-20

Dan Allison1 Comment

The Sacramento Active Transportation Commission will meet this Thursday, March 20, 2025, at 5:30 PM. Comments may be made in person during the meeting, or beforehand via the eComment capability on the Upcoming Meetings page. Though the meeting is live-streamed on that same page, comments may not be made in that way.

The core agenda is:

Consent Calendar

  1. Approval of Active Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
  2. Active Transportation Commission Log

Discussion Calendar

  1. Airport South Industrial Annexation – Amendments to the City Bicycle Master Plan
  2. Streets for People Draft Plan and Phase III Community Engagement Approach (staff report, Streets for People Draft Plan; note: the plan is a large document, and does not include appendices, which can be downloaded from the Streets for People webpage)

In the webinar today, a comment was made that the information in the plan and in the webinar is very complex and hard to get a handle on. I agree. Even as a transportation nerd, it is very hard to digest. I’d suggest the city come up with a simple presention, even simpler than the Executive Summary, that speaks to people who just want better and safer transportation for walking and bicycling, but know little about transportation planning and infrastructure. Some people will want to focus on the streets in their neighborhood where they live, or the routes they travel. Others will want to focus on the policy and approach of the plan. It is probably not possible to look at and understand both.

As I’ve said, I hope to post more detailed information and comments on the plan, but haven’t gotten to that yet.

Caltrans D3 says ‘fuck you’ to Yolo bicyclists

Dan AllisonLeave a comment

The bike path along I-80 along the Yolo causeway is closed this afternoon (Tuesday, 2:00 PM). The sign at the east entry to the bike paths says:

Bike Path Closed sign on east entry to Yolo causeway bike path
Bike Path Closed sign on east entry to Yolo causeway bike path

Note that this sign indicates that the path will not be closed until 8 PM on Tuesday, March 18.

This is what the Caltrans website says (UPDATE: Extended 79-hour Closure for Eastbound U.S. Highway 50 in Yolo County Postponed due to Weather Forecast, 2025-03-13, retrieved 2025-03-18 3:00 PM):

screen capture from Caltrans D3 website
screen capture from Caltrans D3 website

Note that this press release says that the path will be open again by 6:00 AM on Tuesday, March 18.

And this is the reality is:

construction on Yolo causeway bike path
construction on Yolo causeway bike path

Construction is completely blocking the path, at this location and several others. The work to remove the concrete barrier from the freeway is ongoing along the western section of the causeway. Some parts of the freeway are also torn up, awaiting reconstruction.

I talked to the supervisor at this construction location, and he said they are just a subcontractor, not responsible for Caltrans signing, or lack thereof. He called the general contractor, who apparently said it is my problem, not theirs. After exiting at the I-80 off-ramp (the normal entry to the path north to Yolo County 32A is not accessible), I saw a CHP officer, and reported the issue to him. He said he would pass it along. He probably will, but I doubt that either CHP nor Caltrans will do anything about it.

This is an active construction project which was not properly signed for construction. This is a violation of Caltrans procedure, and state law, and federal law.

It is absolutely typical of Caltrans District 3 (which includes Yolo and Sacramento counties) to not care about the travel or safety of bicyclists. What would it take to correct the signing, and to correct the website? Not much, but it is beyond the care and interest of Caltrans D3.

Caltrans has said that as a result of the Yolo 80 project, there would be an improved bike path. I’ve previously written about why that is very likely to be a lie: Yolo causeway bike path. Note that though Caltrans claims the current construction is just bridge rehabilitation and has nothing to do with the Yolo 80 project, that is a lie. It is safe to assume that everything Caltrans D3 says is a lie. Caltrans is a highway department, not a transportation department. They care about motor vehicles. They do not care about walkers or bicyclists or air quality or the state budget. In fact, given the high fatality rate on both under-construction and completed highway projects, they don’t really care about motor vehicle drivers either.

I will also note that the California Transportation Commission (CTC) is complicit in Caltrans D3 malfeasance, as they continue to fund projects no matter what the behavior or violation of the law. And above CTC, California State Transportation Agency, which is intended to oversee both CTC and Caltrans, but does not.

this week 2025-03-17

Dan AllisonLeave a comment

SacMoves Coalition hosts an event calendar at https://sacmoves.org/events/, which is maintained by STAR (Sacramento Transit Advocates and Riders) and Getting Around Sacramento. ‘This week’ postings are irregular.

Monday 17

  • House Sacramento (SacYIMBY), 6:00 PM, New Helvetia Brewing (the meeting was moved to Urban Roots; future meeting dates and locations yet to be determined)

Tuesday 18

  • SacCity Streets for People Citywide Virtual Workshop #1; 12:00 PM; register
  • Sacramento City Council; 5:00 PM; agenda

Wednesday 19

  • SACOG Transit Coordinating Committee, 9:00 AM, via Zoom; agenda; post
  • SacCity Streets for People Citywide Virtual Workshop #2; 5:00 PM; register

Thursday 20

  • SACOG Board, 9:45 AM; Rocklin (not Sac) or online; agenda
  • SacRT MAC (Mobility Advisory Council), 2:30 PM; agenda; post
  • SacATC (Sacramento Active Transportation Commission), 5:30 PM; agenda; post

Friday 21

Saturday 22

Sunday 23

I missed two important meetings the previous week, because they were not on their usual schedule: CARTA on Monday, 10th, and SacTA, Thursday, 13th.