One nation, under Trump
Divided
With liberty and justice for a very few
Author: Dan Allison
Norwood Avenue
The city is asking for public input on a project to increase safety and mobility on Norwood Avenue in north Sacramento. I have not had a chance to look at the details, so for now I’ll just repost the article from the city’s Sacramento City Express. The project web page has more details, including street cross-sections for the three alternatives.
Community invited to weigh in on plan to address safety on Norwood Avenue
Residents in north Sacramento are invited to help shape the future of Norwood Avenue as the next phase of a transportation safety and mobility project gets underway.
The Norwood Mobility Project is focused on a two-mile stretch of Norwood Avenue between Main Avenue and Arcade Creek—an area identified as part of the city’s High Injury Network due to its history of serious traffic collisions.
After initial community engagement beginning last fall, City transportation staff are now presenting a set of proposed design alternatives and gathering public input to develop a final concept that improves safety and mobility for all users, including pedestrians, cyclists, transit riders and drivers.
“We’ve heard from residents about the challenges they face walking or biking along Norwood, especially near schools and bus stops,” said associate transportation planner Charisse Padilla. “This is the community’s opportunity to directly influence the changes we make to the corridor.”
Upcoming public engagement opportunities include an in-person open house on Saturday, June 7, from 10-11:30 a.m. at the Robertson Community Center, and a virtual workshop on Monday, June 9, from 6:30-7:30 p.m. Registration is required for the virtual meeting.
Residents can also share their feedback on the proposed alternatives through an online survey.
The Norwood Mobility Project is funded through a Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant. A draft plan is expected this fall, with final recommendations anticipated in early 2026.
Having a Council-adopted plan ensures the City is eligible for competitive grant funding for any next phases such as Preliminary Engineering Design, Environmental Clearance, Final Design and Construction.
For more information or to provide input, visit the Norwood Mobility Project page at norwoodmobility.org.
I’m not looking at you
Everywhere I travel, and walk, most other people walking will at least glance at me, and often acknowledge or smile, and sometimes say hi or good morning or good evening, or even talk. But that is rare in Sacramento. At least on the sidewalk, this is the least friendly place I’ve ever lived.
People passing look studiously at their phones, as though there were something important there, or look at the ground, or look away to the other side. 95% of people walking will not make eye contact, let alone give a positive vibe.
Why is this a transportation issue? The message is that I am an island (Simon and Garfunkel), I don’t need you, I don’t acknowledge you, I don’t care about you. Communities are built on trust, and trust does not occur if people don’t interact with other people. Sacramento (the city and region) has serious problems that can only be solved by group action and personal engagement. In particular, we have a very serious problem with traffic violence. That we are so bad at solving our problems is not surprising when we don’t think of anyone else except close friends as ‘our people’. Of course this is worse since the pandemic, but it has existing as long as I have lived in Sacramento (14 years) and spent time in Sacramento (22 years).
Is it different elsewhere? Yes, it is. In San Francisco, almost everyone I pass on the sidewalk will at least nod their head, and frequently more. Los Angeles. Portland. Seattle. Las Vegas. Denver. Salt Lake City. San Diego. And on and on.
I am very sad about this. But I do not know the cause, and I do not know the solution.
the worst drivers
I frequently travel to cities on the west coast and the intermountain west, and just recently traveled to several cities in the southern and eastern states. When I travel, I am always paying attention to transportation systems and driver behavior, in no small part because I get around by walking, bicycling and transit. From these experiences, I can state clearly that Sacramento has the worst drivers of any city I’ve visited. The incidence of aggressive and belligerent drivers is probably about average. What is so different, though, is the low skill level of drivers here. A brief list:
- unawareness of traffic law (California Vehicle Code), both old and new
- oblivious to what is going on around them, focused on their phone or car or daydreaming, not paying attention to others on and off the roadway
- no understanding of taking turns at intersections with four-way stop signs; the most basic rule of intersections, first come – first served, is apparently not known by most drivers
- uncertainty about where their vehicle is on the road; drifting into adjacent traffic lanes and bike lanes, stopping where they probably did not intend to stop; this is not just a problem of oversized trucks and SUVs where the driver cannot actually see the roadway, but for most drivers of most vehicles; the damage to vertical delineators, medians, traffic circles and roundabout, and curbs, attests that they don’t know where their vehicle is, or don’t care
- unwillingness to stop (or yield, as the law states) for people walking across the street at intersections
- failing to look when entering or exiting driveways for people on the sidewalk
- running stop signs
- running red lights
And most irritating to me, stopping for bicyclists when the driver has the right of way and the bicyclist does not. This teaches bicyclists to go when it is not legal for them to do so, and not safe. It also delays bicyclists. I once totaled up the amount of time I wasted waiting for drivers to take their legal right of way, and it was about 20 hours per year. Time that I will never get back.
I agree that really solving bad driver behavior requires correcting the roadways. But we have spent billions building unsafe roadways, and will have to spend billions making roadways safe again. When will we have that kind of money?
Again, Sacramento is sort of in the middle of cities making changes to their roadways. Much less than many cities (most notably the bay area), but significantly more than many cities. So the lack of safe roadways does not explain all of the bad driver behavior. Drivers here really are less skilled.
Why? I don’t know. But I’m certainly getting tired of it. Nearly every trip I take walking and bicycling, I am threatened by unskilled drivers, yes, and sometimes belligerent drivers. Sometimes many times on a single trip. I have a high level of skill in both walking and bicycling, watching out for and responding to unskilled driving. But what of everyone else who does not have that skill level? It is ironic that I, as a walker and bicyclist, need a high level of skill to navigate our transportation system, but the same expectation of drivers does not exist.
parking lot madness
20225-06-05: Updated with a photo, at bottom.
The state Department of General Services is repaving a parking lot across the street from me, the northwest corner of P Street and 13th Street. Was there anything wrong with this parking lot? Were there potholes? Was there pavement deterioration? No, no, no. Apparently the state has unlimited tax dollars to burn on unnecessary projects. Even if there were problems, the parking lot could have been overlaid. But instead it is being stripped, and will be replaced by entirely new pavement.

This is not the first time the state has done unnecessary work on parking lots. Last yet the state repaved the parking lot at the southwest corner of O Street and 12th Street. The state re-did a parking lot on the southeast corner of P Street and 11th Street. And even installed wiring and posts for vehicle charging, which was never finished. These are the ones I’ve noticed, but there are likely more. If you have noticed others, please comment here so that they are documented.
The state is facing a $12B deficit for next fiscal year (starting July 1, 2025). Repaving parking lots is pocket change in comparison. But it is a clear indication that the state does not care about saving money, and thinks there is no limit to reaching into your pocket for your pocket change to fuel unnecessary projects.
The most egregious part of this project is that the state is wholly committing itself to maintaining these parcels as parking lots. Surface parking lots are a crime against nature, a crime against rational transportation policy, a crime against climate (they are urban heat islands unto themselves), and a crime against livability. These state-owned parking lots should be converted to housing. The state and the city were complicit in erasing housing throughout the downtown area, in order to clear the city of ‘those people’ and give the state seemingly free land on which to build state offices. The state pays no property tax on these parcels, so it has no motivation to make more productive use of them. It is time to change that. I’d like to see legislation that would force the state to either transfer these surface parking lots to the city, or to CADA (Capitol Area Development Agency) which is a city-state partnership, or to pay property taxes, not just on the low-value parking lots, but on the buildings which were there before the state and city erased them.
2025-06-05: Today, most of the parking lot was paved with asphalt. As you can see in the photo below, it is black, black. So a light grey aged asphalt, somewhat reflective, was replaced with black, non-reflective asphalt. Could the state have used lighter asphalt? Sure. Could they have paid attention to cool pavement practices (US EPA: Using Cool Pavements to Reduce Heat Islands) used in other places? Sure. But they did not. Walking by on the sidewalk on P Street, the part that was paved this morning, and has cooled from installation temperatures, you can feel the heat waves rising off. This will be a great heat island addition for the city!

my Amtrak rail pass and contra dance trip
The main reason that posts here have been absent for the last month is that I was gone on a 30-day trip with an Amtrak Rail Pass. I went to Los Angeles, New Orleans, Charlotte, Greensboro, Asheville and Carrboro/Chapel Hill (not on Amtrak), Philadelphia, Chicago, Denver, and home. Almost half of my trip was in North Carolina, where I’d never been before, with contra dances four evenings and a weekend. And visited friends in North Carolina, and my cousin in Denver.
There are a millions things I could comment on about Amtrak trains, about transportation and transit in the places I visited, and about livability of different cities and neighborhoods. I suppose I could have posted while on the trip, but I was too busy! Whether I’ll post now that I’m home, time will tell.
There should be more posts upcoming, at least until my summer backpacking season starts. Crossing the Sierra Nevada on the California Zephyr through Truckee, I saw that it will be a while before the passes are clear enough for may backpacking, though lower elevation areas are already clear or patchy.
SacATC 2025-05-15
Added comments on agenda 3 ‘Vision Zero School Safety Project’, below.
The Sacramento Active Transportation Commission (SacATC) will meet Thursday, May 15, 2025, at 5:30 PM. The meeting will be at Sacramento City Hall, council chambers, The meeting is livestreamed from the Upcoming Meetings Materials page. Comments may be made in-person, or via eComment on the Upcoming Meetings Materials page up to the time of the meeting, but should be submitted well ahead of time if you wish the commission members to see the comment before the meeting.
Agenda (pdf; the agenda below is abbreviated; consult the pdf agenda for details)
Consent Calendar
- Approval of Active Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
- Active Transportation Commission Log
Discussion Calendar
- Vision Zero School Safety Project: staff report | presentation
- Nomination and Appointment of One Active Transportation Commission Member to the Secure Bike Parking Pilot Evaluation Panel
Commission Staff Report
Commissioner Comments – Ideas and Questions
Public Comments-Matters Not on the Agenda Adjournment
Agenda item 3 Vision Zero School Safety Project
I support this project. The focus on lower-income schools with existing safety issues, and use of relatively inexpensive measures such as high visibility crosswalks, and curb and bike lane paint, are good.
- The diagrams, both in the staff report and the presentation, should include the posted speed limit of each street. RRFBs are inappropriate for speeds over 25 mph, due to driver non-compliance, so the posted speed is an important consideration.
- APS (accessible pedestrian signal) ‘upgrades’ (West Campus, Natomas, Smythe, Kenney) should implement appropriate accessible messages, but SHOULD NOT implement required push buttons. Nothing in PROWAG requires that APS signals require button press for permission to cross. Required ‘beg buttons’ are inappropriate at these locations, and at all locations in the city.
- Though permanent curb extensions are probably beyond the funding of these school projects, I was surprised to not see any temporary or quick-build curb extensions, which are one of the most effective measures for calming traffic.
Sac City Council 2025-05-13
The Sacramento City Council will meet Tuesday, May 13, 2025 (today!) at 5:00 PM. There are two items that might be of interest to transportation advocates.
Item 02 on the consent calendar is ‘Approve Criteria and Guidance to Accommodate Active Transportation in Work Zones Policy’. There is a staff report, and the policy itself. Though items on the consent calendar are not expected to be controversial, and will only be discussed by council if a council members pulls it from consent calendar, this is nevertheless worth supporting. This policy has been delayed for years. It is not perfect, but it is an immense improvement over existing policy and practice.
Item 09 on the agenda is ‘Fiscal Year (FY) 2025/26 Proposed Budget Overview‘. The budget should reflect the priorities of citizens in Sacramento, but it only partially does.
SACOG Transportation Committee 2025-05-15
The SACOG Transportation Committee will meet Thursday, May 15, 2025, at 10:00 AM. The meeting is at 1415 L St, Ste 300, Sacramento, CA. It can be viewed livestream via the link on the Meetings and Agendas page. Comments may be made in-person or by email ahead of time to the clerk, lespinoza@sacog.org. To be seen by the committee members, they must be emailed at least 48 hours beforehand, though they become part of the record if emailed after that deadline.
Agenda (pdf; the agenda below is abbreviated, see the full pdf agenda for details; for staff reports and other documents, select html agenda on the Meetings and Agendas page)
Consent:
- Approve Minutes of the April 3, 2025, Committee Meeting
- Engage, Empower, Implement Grant Reallocation
- Approve Scope Change for City of Marysville Sustainable Mobility Program project
- Approve Scope Change for City of West Sacramento “Great Delta Trail: Clarksburg Branch Line Extension”
Action:
- Request for Project Funding Transfers (Miguel Mendoza)
- Mobility Zones Adoption (Kathleen Hanley)
Information:
- 2025 Four-County State Funding Program Progress Report (David Pape)
- Federal Fiscal Year 2024 Project Delivery Report (Miguel Mendoza)
- Transportation Options for Upcoming A’s Games (Nicole Zhi Ling Porter)
- Report on Cap-to-Cap Trip & SACOG Tour (Lanette Espinoza)
Receive & File:
- Transit Financial Planning Efforts: Scope, Coordination, and Timeline (Leo Torres) staff report | underway
- 2026 Regional Trail Implementation Strategy Update – Prioritization Methodology (Summer Lopez)
Optional Presentation Funding Round Briefing (Noon-1:00 p.m.)
If time allows, I may add comments about some agenda items.
this week 2025-05-12
Monday 12
- SacRT Board Meeting, 4:00 PM, in-person or YouTube
Tuesday 13
- Sac City Council, 5:00 PM, 02 work zones policy (consent); 09 FY 2025-2026 budget overview
Wednesday 14
Thursday 15
- SACOG Transportation Committee, 10:00 AM, in-person or streaming
- SacRT Mobility Advisory Council (MAC), 2:30 PM, in-person or Zoom
- Sacramento Transportation Advisory Commission (SacATC), 5:30 PM, in-person or streaming
Friday 16
Saturday 17
Sunday 18
