- Arden Arcade residents question apartment project (SacBee 2014-12-26)
- West Sacramento mayor puts his mortgage where his mouth is (SacBee 2014-12-26)
- Parks rule! (Sacramento News & Review 2014-12-25)
- Tahoe’s crumbling Fanny Bridge to be replaced (SacBee 2014-12-25)
- Midtown bait bike thefts result in two arrests (SacBee 2014-12-24)
- Bikes give needy children transportation, freedom (SacBee 2014-12-24)
- CHP plans decoy operation to improve pedestrian, bicyclist safety (SacBee 2014-12-23)
- Sacramento police seek new leads in 2013 hit-and-run death of 11-year-old (SacBee 2014-12-23)
- 700 K beginning construction this week (SacBee 2014-12-22)
Author: Dan Allison
Protected Intersections
When I posted on the North 12th Street Complete Street Project, I expressed concern about how the cycle track to the north would transition to the bike lane to the south, and how bicyclists northbound would access the cycle track. On Wednesday I attended the project open house at City Hall. Preliminary designs presented by the contractor Echelon Transportation Group indicate one possible design for the intersection of 12th Street and C Street, a protected intersection. These conceptual design drawings are not yet available on the North 12th website, so I don’t have a drawing to share here. Comments from the open house and online will be used to revise the concepts, and they should then be available on the website for further review and comment.
The protected intersection is a design new to the United States, and so far not built anywhere in its entirety. The design is fairly common in bicycling friendly countries in Europe. The Protected Intersections for Bicyclists website provides a great video showing how the design works by providing a higher level of safety for bicyclists and pedestrians without much impact on motor vehicles. The design has not yet been included in the NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide, but I would guess it soon will be.

The diagram at right shows the general outline of a protected intersection. The intersection at 12th and C would look like the right half of the diagram on the west side, with the almond shaped corner medians, but would not look like the left half on the east side. Bicyclists heading south out of the cycle track would either continue south in the bike lane or use the protected intersection to turn east and then continue south on lower traffic streets. Bicyclists coming from the east would use the protected intersection to get to the west side and the cycle track.
News summary December 21
Carnage
- Man in wheelchair dies after south Sacramento crash with car (SacBee 2014-12-18)
Other
- SkyWest flees, leaving Chico grounded; also about freeway on/off ramps in Davis (SacBee 2014-12-19)
- Could Kaiser be eyeing railyard for a new hospital? (SacBee 2014-12-18)
- Letter: Insane jihad against car traffic (Sacramento News & Review 2014-12-17)
- California highways seeing record traffic, bucking years of decline (SacBee 2014-12-17)
- Can Midtown survive its latest gentrification wave? (Sacramento News & Review 2014-12-17)
- Editorial: Sacramento streetcar project deserves to stay on track (SacBee 2014-12-15)
- Watt Ave. interchange signals new traffic era in Sacramento (SacBee 2014-12-15)
South Sacramento Vision Zero
WALKSacramento and other partners are hosting a Vision Zero Kick-Off Meeting on Wednesday, January 14 in south Sacramento, part of the ongoing Building Healthy Communities project. This is the first event in Sacramento, and I encourage you to participate, even if you don’t reside or work in south Sacramento. A city, county and region can be judged by how it treats its most vulnerable citizens, and there is no doubt that walking (and bicycling) safely is a major justice challenge for south Sacramento. Click on the thumbnail at right to view the flier.
From WALKSacramento’s email:
You are invited to join WALKSacramento on January 14, 2015 as we launch “Vision Zero” in South Sacramento.
Vision Zero aims to reduce pedestrian and bicycle fatalities to ZERO by improving infrastructure, education, and enforcement. We’re starting a Vision Zero project in South Sacramento because we know that it is within our power to prevent these tragedies on our streets.
We need better street design, better regulations, and better enforcement.
Let’s start talking about what we can do to help make Sacramento streets safer.
For more information and to RSVP, please contact Emily Alice Gerhart, egerhart@walksacramento.org
Vision Zero, which started in Sweden, is now a wordwide effort to eliminate pedestrian, bicyclist and motor vehicle fatalities. In the United States, New York and San Francisco are leaders, but the idea is now being talked about nearly everywhere, including Sacramento.
A Vision Zero for Cities Symposium was held in November in New York City, with attendance by a few people from the Sacramento region. Transportation Alternatives has posted the Collectively Drafted Statement of Principles from that symposium, and Streetsblog USA has a good summary of the event at What Would a National Vision Zero Movement Look Like?
News summary December 14
- Downtown Sacramento, West Sacramento streetcar vote set (SacBee 2014-12-12)
- Vision for 16-story tower next to downtown arena (Sacramento Business Journal 2014-12-12); Kings say developments near Sacramento arena will cost $250 million (SacBee 2014-12-12)
- Pioneering hydrogen fuel cell station opens in West Sacramento (Sacramento Business Journal 2014-12-10)
- Third fatality on light-rail tracks in Rancho Cordova identified (SacBee 2014-12-09); Pedestrian killed by Sacramento light rail train in Rancho Cordova (SacBee 2014-12-08); I don’t understand why this keeps happening
- So far, opposition scarce for proposed midtown Whole Foods (Sacramento Business Journal 2014-12-08); that’s a whole lot of parking for an area that I don’t believe needs much parking
Crash, crash, crash
I don’t know whether the term accident has a new-found popularity, or whether I’m just more sensitive to it the last week, but it seems like everywhere I look in the news media, there it is, the term accident. I’m talking here about use for motor vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians.
The term accident implies that no one was at fault, it just happened, an act of nature. But nothing that occurs on the roadways is an accident. Someone caused it, or someone contributed to it.
#NotAnAccident (yes, I realize that this twitter tag gets used for other things, but I haven’t thought of a better one)
I have been using the term crash in place of accident for several years. However, several people have commented that crash may be more appropriate to a single user situation, as in, the car crashed into a tree, or the bicyclist crashed on slippery pavement. The word collision implies two or more users, as in, a collision between a motor vehicle and a bicycle or pedestrian. But I’m not yet entirely happy with those definitions either. Incident has also been suggested, but that seems to clinical to me, almost a valueless opposite of accident.
Here are some links:
- Was that an accident or a crash? (Arizona Bike Law 2014-12-01)
- After Criticism, Police Change Policy and Begin Investigating More Traffic Crashes (New York Times 2013-03-10)
- It’s Time for the AP to Nix the Term “Accident” to Describe Car Collisions (Streetsblog USA 2013-12-11)
- Motor vehicle crash versus accident: a change in terminology is necessary. (PubMed)
- Crash Not Accident (RoadPeace)
- Terminology debate: crash versus collision (Steven Can Plan 2012-05-18)
News summary December 7
Carnage
- Pedestrian dies from injuries suffered in collision with SUV (SacBee 2014-12-05)
Other
- Opinion: How Sacramento fought to save a neighborhood – and changed its image (SacBee 2014-12-07)
- Industrial building sells on Sacramento’s suddenly hot R Street (SacBee 2014-12-05)
- Book of Dreams: Bikes sought for youths in Serna Village, those served by Sacramento Sheriff’s Bike Unit (SacBee 2014-12-05)
- Back-Seat Driver: Sacramento, where streets become rivers (SacBee 2014-12-05)
- Pedestrian killed on Jackson Road identified (SacBee 2014-12-02)
- Railyard developer says top prospects are soccer stadium, public market, world food center (Sacramento Business Journal 2014-12-02)
- En route: Regional Transit getting almost 100 natural-gas buses (Sacramento Business Journal 2014-12-01)
- Owners of Marshall Hotel plan to transform historic downtown property (Sacramento Business Journal 2014-12-01)
News summary November 30
Carnage
- Bicyclist dies when struck by truck in Sacramento (SacBee 2014-11-26); Bicyclist killed by truck identified (SacBee 2014-11-28)
Other
- Dixon’s downtown depot: Will the train ever stop here? (SacBee 2014-11-30)
- More than one way (Sacramento News & Review 2014-11-27)
- Opening Doors — Lots of Them: Multifamily construction plays catch-up with surging demand (Comstock’s 2014-11-25)
- New development team takes on The Creamery infill project (Sacramento Business Journal 2014-11-25)
One-way streets, again
I’m glad to see the idea of converting one-way streets to two-way streets to improve livability and safety is back in the news: More than one way (Sacramento News & Review 2014-11-27).
The reasons given, by Chris Morfas, William Burg, Jim Brown, Dave Saalsaa, and Emily Baime Michaels are all good, strong reasons for conversion.
The comments by Sparky Harris are a little disingenuous. The city already has a plan to convert one-way to two-way, documented in the 2006 Central City Two-Way Conversion Study Final Environmental Impact Statement (no long available on the city’s website, but I have a copy of this large document if you want it). It is interesting that it is not longer on the website. Eight years ago the changes in driving and living habit were starting to become obvious, and even at that time, it was clear that there were considerable benefits from conversion. Except for a very few streets that were converted when they were resurfaced, nothing has been done. Now another study? I’d rather see more action and less study. Yes, some conversions will not have benefits that are as strong, and some will be controversial, but converting many of the streets is “low-hanging” fruit, something that should already be underway and not awaiting more study.
I’ve written about this idea in several posts:
Active Transportation Program (ATP) in region
This is not fresh news, but I just realized that I had not posted about grants in the Sacramento region under the Active Transportation Program cycle 1 awards in 2014.
Regional grants from the statewide program:
- PLA, Roseville, Downtown Roseville Class 1 Trails, $2,547K
- SAC, Elk Grove, Lower Laguna Creek Open Space Preserve Trail, $1,778K
- SAC, Sacramento County, Howe Ave Sidewalk Infill and Bike Lane Improvements, $1,853K
- SAC, San Juan USD, SRTS, $250K
- YOL, Davis, SRTS Program, $562K
- YOL, Woodland, 2014 SRTS, $539K
- YUB, Marysville, SRTS Project & Programs, $489K
SACOG region grants:
- ELD, El Dorado County Transportation Commission, Western Slope Bicycle Travel Opportunities Map $50K
- PLA, City of Auburn, Nevada Street Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities $799K
- PLA, City of Colfax, North Main Street Bike Route Project $264K
- SAC, City of Galt, South Galt Safe Routes to Schools $1,800K
- SAC, City of Rancho Cordova, Mather Rails to Trails Project $2,235K
- SAC, Sacramento County, El Camino Avenue Phase 2 – Street and Sidewalk Improvements $1,692K
- SAC, City of Folsom, Oak Parkway Trail Undercrossing and Johnny Cash Trail Connection Project $992K
- SUT, City of Yuba City, Franklin Road Improvements $313K
- YOL, City of West Sacramento, Citywide Bike Lane Gap Closures $525K
- YUB, Yuba County, Ella Elementary School Safe Routes to School Project $1,195K
There are also three projects on the SACOG contingency list.