News summary 2012-11-26

Groups reach settlement on Highway 50 to I-5 connector (Sacramento Business Journal 2012-11-26)

City offers free on-street parking for holiday shoppers (Sacramento Press 2012-11-26)

Stockton Boulevard hit-and-run vehicle description updated (Sacramento Press 2012-11-21)

Boy killed in Elk Grove traffic accident is identified (SacBee 2012-11-20)

Work on West Sacramento apartments just beginning of development (Sacramento Business Journal 2012-11-20)

Book of Dreams adaptive bicycles

Two of the three lead projects in the Sacramento Bee’s Book of Dreams holiday effort are adaptive bicycles:

I’ve already made a donation to both, and I’d recommend that every bicyclist donate. Adaptive bikes are expensive because they have a large number of adjustments and features for the specific individual. The donations are to a fund managed by the Sacramento Region Community Foundation.

20121121-054948.jpg

No net pavement: a modest proposal

I have long been thinking about a policy for construction of roads and highways, that would result in no more pavement. A post by Charles Marohn on Strong Towns blog titled “What is the federal role?” reminded me that I’d not posted on my idea. An excerpt from his post:

So if you forced me to have a federal transportation bill, then I would want it to do two things. First, I would want it to place a moratorium on the expansion, extension or construction of any new auto-oriented facilities. No new road miles anywhere. There is no need for this country to ever build another mile, another lane, another overpass or anything — we have far more than we can take care of now, most of it very unproductive. I would make this exception, however: any state that wants a new mile of highway has to remove two miles of existing. This would allow flexibility for states that wanted a strategic contraction, allowing them to allocate scarce resources to areas that would have the greatest benefit. In short, I would ensure the bill funded maintenance (which would make it politically irrelevant in the current context, but that is beside the point).”

I worked for several years in the Lake Tahoe basin, doing watershed education. The policy for hard coverage such as buildings and pavement, which produces runoff to the lake and a decline in water quality, is that there be no net increase in coverage over time. If a developer or homeowner wants to increase their coverage by expanding the areal extent of a building or parking lots, they must retire other buildings or pavement. The policy has been quite effective, and is primarily responsible the reversal in the steep decline of lake clarity. I realized that the policy would be a good one to apply everywhere. Pavement everywhere has the same effect, causing rain and snow to run off, carrying sediment and debris into waterways. Less pavement equals cleaner water. But there are so many more benefits of less pavement to the environment and to livability in towns and cities, that it makes no sense to continue paving, anywhere, anytime.Read More »

News summary 2012-11-19

Folsom seeks public input for first general plan update since 1988 (SacBee 2012-11-19)

Editorial: City of Sacramento finally gets smart about parking with flexible rules for business (SacBee 2012-11-19)

12-year-old boy hit by trailer, killed on Elk Grove street (SacBee 2012-11-18); Boy killed in Elk Grove traffic accident is identified (SacBee 2012-11-19)

Editorial: County should reject Cordova Hills (SacBee 2012-11-18)

Sacramento police, transit officials investigate collision of light rail train, tractor trailer (SacBee 2012-11-18)

Environment compromise reached for beltway in southeast Sacramento County (SacBee 2012-11-17)

Sacramento eases parking requirements for new projects (SacBee 2012-11-16); the bicycle parking information is way down in the article, but definitely of interest

Woman pushing wheelchair killed in Midtown light-rail train accident (SacBee 2012-11-16)

Highway 50 interchange makeover at Watt Avenue to add lanes for buses, bikes and pedestrians (SacBee 2012-11-14)

Editorial: One step ahead on Sac River parkway (SacBee 2012-11-13)

Coroner identifies cyclist killed in hit and run on Stockton Boulevard (SacBee 2012-11-12); UPDATE: Police release description of pickup sought in Stockton Boulevard hit-and-run (SacBee 2012-11-12)

Woman arrested after death of pedestrian in South Sacramento (SacBee 2012-11-12)

Watt Ave. interchange ready for its makeover (SacBee 2012-11-12, not available on website); link to SacDOT page on project

No new road miles…

So if you forced me to have a federal transportation bill, then I would want it to do two things. First, I would want it to place a moratorium on the expansion, extension or construction of any new auto-oriented facilities. No new road miles anywhere. There is no need for this country to ever build […]

Sacramento River Parkway next step November 13

existing pathway on Sacramento River levee

At the November 13 Sacramento City Council meeting, the next step for the Sacramento River Parkway will be on the agenda. This is just a small step. primarily to allocate funds to start property research, but it is an important next step. It may be controversial, with a small number of property owners in the Pocket and Little Pocket area opposed to public access to the publicly owned levees. The City Council meeting starts at 6:00PM, in the City Council Chambers of the City Hall at 915 I St. It is difficult to guess how much time will be taken with preceding agenda items, but item 19 might come up about 7:30PM.

19. American and Sacramento River Parkway Plans 2012 Implementation Program  Report # 2012-00851 Estimated Time:  45 Minutes
Location: Districts, 3, 4, and 7
Recommendation: Pass a Resolution: 1) approving the American and Sacramento River Parkway Plans 2012 Implementation Program; 2) establishing a new Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the River Parkway Plans Implementation (L19016500) project; 3) transferring $100,000 from the Regional Park/Parkway Acquisition/ Development (L19003500) project to L19016500; 4) authorizing the City Manager, or City Manager’s designee to negotiate with public agencies and private parties for public access trail easements; and 5) authorizing the City Manager, or City Manager’s designee, to coordinate with local, state, and federal agencies regarding associated flood protection permit and easement compliance and removal of unpermitted encroachments. Contact: J.P. Tindell, Park Planning & Development Manager, (916) 808-1955, Parks and Recreation Department Item 19-American and Sacramento River Parkway Plans 2012 Implementation Program  (PDF-1689 KB)

 

Freeport Blvd bike lane project

Freeport Blvd bike lanes project

Tomorrow night (Nov. 8) at 6 PM the Sacramento City Council meets to vote to adopt a plan for the Freeport Blvd. Bike Lane project.

City staff propose replacing 4 substandard-width traffic lanes on Freeport Blvd. between 4th Ave and Sutterville Rd with 5 lanes: 2 standard-width traffic lanes and a center turn lane for motor vehicles and bike lanes in both directions (Segment Design Concept 2 on the website below). Staff also proposes bike-friendly modifications to the intersection at Freeport and 4th Ave, in front of Taylor’s Market (Intersection Design Concept 2).

The segment improvements are exactly what bicyclists need for safety, and while the intersection improvement isn’t the best one (see #4), it’s affordable and workable.This is a good plan and it looks likely a council majority is prepared to approve it.We need **100** bicyclists to attend this meeting to show the council that our community supports these kinds of essential safety improvements. If you ride on Freeport or care about the safety of someone who does, please join us and please share this invitation with others!

Questions? Contact SABA at jim@sacbike.org or 916-444-6600.

News summary 2012-11-02

Editorial: Sacramento River parkway can be real (SacBee, 2012-11-02)

Back-seat Driver: Sacramento railyard open house to show off historic paint shop (2012-11-02)

See the light (Sacramento News & Review, 2012-11-01; there doesn’t seem to be a link for this comment on riding RT light rail from editor Nick Miller)

Government officials champion Sacramento transit (Bus Ride, 2012-11-01)

Fight looms over Sacramento’s fenced-off levees (SacBee, 2012-11-01); Public access to levees would improve safety (SacBee, 2012-11-01); Restore public access to Pocket levees (SacBee, 2012-11-02)

Jury hears pointed final arguments in wrongful-death suit involving RT bus (SacBee, 2012-10-31)

Woman dies after being hit by SUV on Franklin Boulevard (SacBee, 2012-10-31); Coroner IDs pedestrian killed on Franklin Blvd. (SacBee 2012-11-01)

Bike rider dies after falling in Watt traffic lane (SacBee, 2012-10-30); Update: Man run over on Watt Avenue identified (SacBee, 2012-11-01)

Town hall meeting to look at levee access plan (SacBee, 2012-10-28)

Public invited to meeting on Sacramento levee access (2012-10-26)

Built too near the levee? (2012-09-23)

Pedestrian etiquette? (Limit Reached, 2012-10-23; I really don’t know what to make of this, but I guess it is news, or a sort)

Sacramento ranks fourth in U.S. for bicycle commuting (Sacramento Business Journal, 2010-01-17; this is old news, but I found it interesting and wanted to include it)

News summary 2012-10-22

Pursuing nonsprawling city growth with major brownfield redevelopment: the Sacramento Railyards (NRDC Switchboard, 2012-10-19)

Sacramento bicyclists: Don’t get ‘Jerry Browned’ (Sacramento News & Review, 2012-10-18)

Pedestrian on I-5 downtown hit by 3 vehicles (SacBee, 2012-10-18)

Event raises $2,700 for family of boys struck by car (SacBee, 2012-10-18)

Cathie Anderson: Folsom could see housing south of Hwy. 50 in 2014 (SacBee, 2012-10-18) Yah! More sprawl! More traffic! More resource use! Yah!